Legal Opinion

Ralph v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1987No. 01384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order awarding appellee, Timothy Ralph, work loss benefits in the amount of $1,860.58. Appellant, Ohio Casualty Insurance Co., argues that appellee has not met his burden of proving that: (1) the insurance policy issued by Ohio Casualty is the applicable security under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (No-fault Act); 1 and (2) appellee is entitled to benefits under the No-fault Act and under the Ohio Casualty insurance policy. We find that there is a lack of evidentiary support for the trial, court’s finding that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Brenna v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. M. London, Inc. v. Fedders Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Schimmelbusch v. Royal-Globe InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Crawford v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brito v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Lee v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. McCrory v. AbrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. McCrory v. AbrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API