Ralph v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order awarding appellee, Timothy Ralph, work loss benefits in the amount of $1,860.58. Appellant, Ohio Casualty Insurance Co., argues that appellee has not met his burden of proving that: (1) the insurance policy issued by Ohio Casualty is the applicable security under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (No-fault Act); 1 and (2) appellee is entitled to benefits under the No-fault Act and under the Ohio Casualty insurance policy. We find that there is a lack of evidentiary support for the trial, court’s finding that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Brenna v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- M. London, Inc. v. Fedders Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Schimmelbusch v. Royal-Globe InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Crawford v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brito v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Lee v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- McCrory v. AbrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- McCrory v. AbrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995