Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCrory v. Abraham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1995Published

1DissentJohnson, Judge

Where facts alleged in the transfer petition were expressly denied in the Answer to the petition, I believe that the trial court abused its discretion in transferring this matter without benefit of deposition testimony or an evidentiary hearing on disputed issues of material fact. However, even if the taking of evidence was not required, I cannot agree that a change of venue is necessary for the convenience of the parties and witnesses. Accordingly, I must respectfully dissent.

A plaintiffs choice of forum is entitled to weighty consideration and should not be disturbed

*268“unless the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Okkerse v. HoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Petty v. Suburban General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Incollingo v. McCarronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Hosiery Corp. of America, Inc. v. RichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API