Legal Opinion

Harpole v. Conrad N. Hilton Foundation

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1996No. B084575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOLD, J.*

In proceedings for the probate of a decedent’s estate in California, the compensation of the personal representative1 and the compensation of the personal representative’s attorney2 are each fixed through the use of two quite different approaches. To begin with, in every case the personal representative and his or her attorney are entitled to compensation *895based upon a sliding scale of percentages of the value of the estate accounted for.3 (Prob. Code, §§ 10800, 10810.)4 Because this compensation is intended as payment for the services which are involved in substantially every…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of HiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API