Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1976No. S.F. 23217PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Southern Pacific Transportation Company seeks review of Decisions 83509 and 82933 of the Public Utilities Commission, holding that Public Utilities Code section 1202.3 is unconstitutional.1

Following an auto-train collision at a crossing on Southern Pacific Coast Route Main Line, the Public Utilities Commission (commission) investigated the safety, maintenance, operation and use of the crossing.

The commission found that public welfare; convenience and necessity require the crossing be protected by flashing light signals and automatic *311gate arms. It also found the crossing is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Albe v. LOUISIANA WORKERS'COMPENSATION CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API