Ball v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SENTER, Chief Judge.
This cause comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is well taken and should be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the issues of stacking and punitive damages are not well taken and should be denied.
Facts
The facts alleged in this cause are as follows: On April 1, 1985, defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (hereinafter USF & G) issued a garage policy to Charles P.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Standard Life Ins. Co. of Indiana v. VealMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Dennis v. SearleMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curry v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
- Pride v. General Agents Ins. Co. of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1988
- Thomas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Schauger v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997