Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Fulwood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-862 (RWR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are federal inmates who alleged that the U.S. Parole Commission violated the Ex Post Facto Clause in making parole decisions by applying the 2000 parole guidelines rather than the 1972 parole regulations that were in place at the time each plaintiff was sentenced. The plaintiffs also alleged that they were denied fair parole review hearings, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. A previous memorandum opinion granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss both of the plaintiffs’ claims. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Eldridge v. Von BlanckenseeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013