Haney v. Holt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The record shows that the mortgage given by S. H. Haney to H. H. Holt was never recorded or filed for record. The mortgage from S. H. Haney to W. H. Haney was properly acknowledged and filed for record. Hence it is first contended that the Haney mortgage was a superior lien to the Holt mortgage. In making this contention, counsel for appellant (defendant below) rely upon our mortgage statute to the effect that the filing or recording of a chattel mortgage is essential to its .validity as against third persons, even though the subsequent mortgagee has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thornton v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Clapp Bros. v. Halliday Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Nation v. Planters and Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Young v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Ghio v. ByrneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gunnels v. Farmers' Bank of EmersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- City of Rockport v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Henry v. CoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Foster v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Gibson v. DoughtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.