Legal Opinion

Young v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Commission Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from .Jackson Circuit Court: — Hon. Jno. W. Henry, Judge. The chattel mortgages to Pierce and defendant, under which defendant claims, not having been lawfully acknowledged and recorded, did not become valid liens on the lazy S cattle ns against appellants, who by virtue of their mortgage became subsequent purchasers of the same cattle, and who were also creditors 'of Skinner, the common debtor of all the parties.

Read the full summary

Appeal from .Jackson Circuit Court: — Hon. Jno. W. Henry, Judge. The chattel mortgages to Pierce and defendant, under which defendant claims, not having been lawfully acknowledged and recorded, did not become valid liens on the lazy S cattle ns against appellants, who by virtue of their mortgage became subsequent purchasers of the same cattle, and who were also creditors 'of Skinner, the common debtor of all the parties. As against appellants, both as creditors and purchasers, defendant had no lien under either of its mortgages, and as plaintiffs’ mortgage did not create any lien in favor of…

1Opinion of the CourtBrace, P. J.

On the eleventh day of November, *3981895, Nat. Skinner, a resident of the Indian Territory, being the owner and in possession of 879 head of steer cattle, three years old and np, branded S. on the right side, in said territory, executed two chattel mortgages of that date, by one of which, he conveyed said cattle to A. PI. Pierce to secure the payment of a note of the said Skinner of that date for the sum of $14,338, payable nine months after date, given to said Pierce in part payment of the purchase price for said cattle, and by the other he conveyed said cattle, subject to the Pierce…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacoway v. GaultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
  2. Dodd v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  3. Martin v. OgdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Clapp Bros. v. Halliday Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Haskill v. SevierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1867

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Landau v. CottrillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Nation v. Planters and Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Davis v. TandyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Gunnels v. Farmers' Bank of EmersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. American Clay Machinery Co. v. Sedalia Brick & Tile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API