City of Rockport v. City of Malvern
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellants City of Rockport XVa ^and certain taxpayers and citizens of the City appeal from an order finding that it had not complied with Arkansas Code Annotated § 14-40-2002 (Supp. 2003), in providing, or taking substantial steps to provide, requested municipal services to certain landowners who had since been annexed into the City of Malvern. Malvern and the landowners whose property was annexed are the appellees in this matter. Rockport raises four points on appeal: (1) the subject properties were not appropriate for annexation into Malvern under the procedures…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Lee v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Pyle v. SayersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- City of Maumelle v. Jeffrey Sand Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McCombs v. McCombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Rockport v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Anderson v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Beadles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- City of Rockport v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.