Legal Opinion

Williams v. Howell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1989No. 17972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

We have granted certiorari to consider whether on a claim for adverse possession under color of title, extrinsic evidence, not referred to or identified in the deed, is admissible to cure an inadequacy in the deed description.

Plaintiffs-petitioners, H.R. Williams and Rose Lee Williams, initiated this lawsuit in 1986 to quiet title to certain real property located in Winston (formerly the Town of Fairview), Sierra County, New Mexico, and referred to as the Winston Store property. The district court quieted title to the property in the petitioners against the adverse…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Brylinski v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re Estate of DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Madrid v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lopez v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API