Legal Opinion

People v. Moses

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1996No. F023233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WISEMAN, J.

Defendant and appellant, Daniel Clair Moses (defendant), was convicted of two counts of detention of a child (his two children [Kayleigh, age five at the time of trial, and Kyle, age four at the time of trial]) with intent to deprive another (the children’s mother, Renee Moses [Renee]) of the right to custody, in violation of Penal Code section 278.5. 1

The court denied probation and sentenced Moses to state prison for the middle term of two years on each count, to run concurrently. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal and now raises three issues: (1) was there…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. WolcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. People v. NeidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API