Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1996No. C020395PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

A jury convicted defendants Cheval Shannon Wright and Christian Matthew Abernathy of a number of offenses, the most significant of which was first degree murder committed in the course of a robbery or attempted robbery. It found defendant Wright was a principal armed with a handgun that he personally used. As for defendant Abernathy, it rejected allegations he was a principal armed with a handgun or personally used a firearm in the commission of the crime. (Pen. Code, §§ 187-189, 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(i), 12022, subd. (a), 12022.5, subd. (a) [undesignated section references…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. VisciottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. BacigalupoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. SakariasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. ParsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. People v. O'MalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API