Legal Opinion

Tatavich v. Pettine

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1926No. 2859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

WATSON, J.

By a proceeding instituted supplementary to, and two years after, final decree in a divorce suit, it was sought by one party to that suit to impress a trust upon certain property which had been awarded to the other party by said final decree. As ancillary to the main purpose of the proceeding, a temporary injunction was sought and obtained restraining disposition of the property until the further order of the court. To obtain the injunction, a bond was given by the appellants (defendants) in the usual form.

The temporary injunction was, dissolved upon motion of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wittich v. O'NealSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Webb v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dame v. Cochiti Reduction & Improvement Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Woods v. FambroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Herbst v. RogersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Cutter Flying Service, Inc. v. Straughan Chevrolet, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. Board of Education of City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API