Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Stanley v. Lujan
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1939No. 4369PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MABRY, Justice.
Respondents have filed a motion in this case, which was an original proceeding here in prohibition, for an order taxing certain items as costs against the relators. The case was heretofore disposed of after hearing, by dismissal of the writ without reference to costs. See State ex rel. Stanley et al. v. Lujan, Judge, 42 N.M. 291, 77 P.2d 178.
Counsel for respondents conceded that the matter of costs under Section 6 of rule 24 of Supreme Court rules rests in the discretion of the court in matters of this kind.
This rule reads: “The Court, after hearing the proofs and allegations…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gold Dust Corporation v. HoffenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Rowland v. MaddockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Jenkins v. Commercial National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Dame v. Cochiti Reduction & Improvement Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Clovis v. Diane, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Aboud v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.