Legal Opinion
In re Lyders
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 16, 1936No. 26089-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
The debtor seeks to review an order made by the referee in bankruptcy on February 18, 1936, allowing consolidated claims of Inger Marie Petersen and others, in the sum of $20,000 with interest, as a general claim.
The claim is based upon a judgment of the superior court of the. state of California, in and for the county of San Francisco, in a case wherein Inger Marie Petersen et al. were plaintiffs and debtor was defendant. Upon appeal this judgment was affirmed by the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District of the State of California, and rehearing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re FaersteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Green v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Clark v. MilensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- In re WeidenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thummess v. Von HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- In re Amsterdam Brewing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1940