Legal Opinion
In Re Faerstein
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1932No. 6519PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
58 F.2d 942 (1932)
In re FAERSTEIN et al.
COSSACK et al.
v.
MOORE et al.
No. 6519.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 16, 1932.
Hiram E. Casey and A. L. Wirin, both of Los Angeles, Cal., and Loeb L. Cossack, of San Bernardino, Cal., for appellants.
Craig & Weller and Thomas S. Tobin, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Charles Bagg, of San Bernardino, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.
NETERER, District Judge (after stating the facts).
Referees are invested with certain powers, "subject always to a review by the judge." Section 66, title 11,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Harrison v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Babbitt v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Jaquith v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Pottasch Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- J. Clarke Smith and Margaret D. Smith v. Edwin E. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- In Re RidingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
- Cossack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Evelyn Mavity, D/B/A Mavity Motor Company, Bankrupt v. Associates Discount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.