McNulty v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal we consider the contention of defendant below-appellant Ronald McNulty (“McNulty”) that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to support his convictions for Trafficking in Cocaine (the “trafficking offense”), 1 Possession with Intent to Deliver Cocaine (the “possession offense”), 2 Use of a Vehicle for Keeping a Controlled Substance (the “use of vehicle offense”), 3 and Conspiracy Second Degree. 4 For the reasons stated below we: (i) affirm McNulty’s convictions for the possession and trafficking offenses; (ii) reverse and remand the use of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- United States v. HubbardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Hoey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.