Legal Opinion

McNulty v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 5, 1995No. 375, 1994PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we consider the contention of defendant below-appellant Ronald McNulty (“McNulty”) that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to support his convictions for Trafficking in Cocaine (the “trafficking offense”), 1 Possession with Intent to Deliver Cocaine (the “possession offense”), 2 Use of a Vehicle for Keeping a Controlled Substance (the “use of vehicle offense”), 3 and Conspiracy Second Degree. 4 For the reasons stated below we: (i) affirm McNulty’s convictions for the possession and trafficking offenses; (ii) reverse and remand the use of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. HubbardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Hoey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  4. Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  5. Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API