Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 10, 2012No. 240, 2011PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice,

for the majority:

Three officers completed a traffic stop along with the ancillary, permissible inquiries. Then, a probation officer continued to question one of the car’s passengers, a probationer, even though the officer testified he had no reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. An officer who pulls a car over for speeding does not thereby gain free rein to ask as many questions, for as long a time, as he might wish. Further investigation requires further justification. Because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion, we reverse the trial judge’s denial of a motion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ChandlerSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. Mary Doe v. Robert M. CoupeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  4. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. Lloyd v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API