Legal Opinion

Monroe v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 25, 1995No. 426, 1993PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we consider the contention of defendant below-appellant Bobby L. Monroe (“Monroe”) that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions for Burglary Third Degree 1 and Theft Felony. 2 This case presents the questions of whether: (i) latent fingerprints of defendant on the outside door to a burglarized, commercial building is sufficient to convict in the absence of any other evidence in the State’s case-in-chief; and (ii) the failure of defendant to move for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the State’s case bars him from raising…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wright v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. People v. PintosIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Campbell v. BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Swan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API