Monroe v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal we consider the contention of defendant below-appellant Bobby L. Monroe (“Monroe”) that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions for Burglary Third Degree 1 and Theft Felony. 2 This case presents the questions of whether: (i) latent fingerprints of defendant on the outside door to a burglarized, commercial building is sufficient to convict in the absence of any other evidence in the State’s case-in-chief; and (ii) the failure of defendant to move for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the State’s case bars him from raising…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wright v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. PintosIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Campbell v. BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Swan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.