Tappe v. Lieberman
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
The plaintiff, Julius M. Tappe, aka Mike Tappe (hereafter Tappe), commenced an unlawful detainer action against defendant, Richard P. Lieberman (hereafter Lieberman), following the latter’s failure to comply with a 30-day notice to terminate. The tenancy consisted of an oral agreement to rent four rooms in a multiunit commercial-residential property located at 1114 Sutter Street, San Francisco. The case proceeded to trial and judgment was entered for Lieberman.
The trial court determined that Tappe’s failure to comply with certain notice requirements imposed by section 37.9(b)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. NixenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Prunty v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Cory v. Golden State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HaightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Parkmerced Co. v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Chan v. AntepenkoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988
- Chan v. AntepenkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.