Legal Opinion
Chan v. Antepenko
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 1988No. 4344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
203 Cal.App.3d 21 (1988)
250 Cal. Rptr. 851
BIANNE CHAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
GREGORY ANTEPENKO, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. 4344.
Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Francisco.
June 13, 1988.
COUNSEL
Steven H. Rosenthal for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Marc S. Janowitz for Defendant and Respondent.
[Opinion certified for partial publication.[*]]
OPINION
STEIN, P.J.
The plaintiffs, Bianne and Shu W. Chan (hereinafter Owners), commenced an unlawful detainer action against defendant, Gregory Antepenko, seeking to recover possession of an apartment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Von Goerlitz v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Roberts v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Karz v. MechamAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1981
- Tappe v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1983
- Chan v. AntepenkoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Safeguard Self-Storage Trust, Debtor. Wattson Pacific Ventures v. Valley Federal Savings & Loan, Safeguard Self-Storage TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ming Ming Wu v. City of Redwood CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pick v. CohenAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2000
- Regents of the University of California v. LTI Flexible Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022