Legal Opinion
Local Division 519, Amalgamated Transit Union v. LaCrosse Municipal Transit Utility
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 8, 1978No. 77-C-292PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This opinion and order are directed to a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
On August 3, 1977, the plaintiff (“Local 519”) filed a verified complaint alleging jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 49 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and a motion for a preliminary injunction ordering defendants (collectively referred to herein as “LaCrosse”) to enter into arbitration of the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement. On August 23, 1977, defendants filed an answer to the complaint which, among other things, denied that…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Local Division 519, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Lacrosse Municipal Transit Utility and City of Lacrosse, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Local Div. No. 714, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Greater Portland Transit District of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Franks v. ThomasonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
- Division 1287, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Gensplit Finance Corp. v. Foreign Credit Ins. Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.