Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Appeal of Carol Hill

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 11, 1986No. 85-1702PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents three questions: whether, under the circumstances before us, the Government must show need and relevance before a Grand Jury subpoena can be enforced against Carol Hill, a paralegal; whether the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing on Hill’s motion for disclosure of electronic surveillance; and whether Hill’s right to confrontation was violated when the district court considered in camera an ex parte affidavit before ruling on her motions.

Facts

Carol Hill was subpoenaed to testify before, and to provide fingerprints, handwriting exemplars and a photograph…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Donald K. Stern v. United States District Court for the District of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Grand Jury 11-84. Everett E. Worthington, Witness-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Colson v. JoyceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1986
  4. United States v. GumbaytayDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2011
  5. United States v. LillyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API