David L. Ladd, Register of Copyrights, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Law & Technology Press, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Law & Technology Press (Press) refused to deposit, two copies of its publication with the Library of Congress as is required by the copyright law. Press claims that the deposit requirement is an unconstitutional taking under the fifth amendment and an unconstitutional burden on the press under the first amendment. Press also contends that the trial court abused its discretion by granting summary judgment for the government without permitting Press discovery. We conclude that there were no genuine issues of material fact, nor were there additional facts to be elicited…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert W. Hall, an Individual v. State of Hawaii, a State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Figueroa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Valancourt Books, LLC v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Rudnicki v. WPNA 1490 AMDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Eldred, Eric v. Reno, JanetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.