Legal Opinion

Rudnicki v. WPNA 1490 AM

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 24, 2008No. 04 C 5719PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES B. MORAN, Senior District Judge.

In this suit, plaintiff claims that defendants infringed copyrights on various radio addresses. Plaintiff moved in limine “to preclude the defendants from arguing non-registration of plaintiffs works,” and defendants responded that they cannot answer the motion without first taking plaintiffs deposition. But we determined that plaintiffs motion was limited in scope and did not require a deposition for resolution, so we instead asked the parties to respond to the limited question of whether plaintiff followed the right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Jcw Investments, Inc., D/B/A Tekky Toys v. Novelty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Automation by Design, Incorporated v. Raybestos Products Company, Raytech Corporation and Production Design Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. David L. Ladd, Register of Copyrights, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Law & Technology Press, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Football Ass'n Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Vergara Hermosilla v. the Coca-Cola Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  3. Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Chadha v. Tech Matrix Infosolutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  5. Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API