Legal Opinion
California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. H. R. Nicholson Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1945No. Civ. 12804PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff alleged two separate counts against the defendant. It pleaded a charge that the defendant was guilty of infringing on the plaintiff’s trademark and that the defendant was guilty of unlawful and unfair acts of competition. The defendant denied said allegations, and on those pleadings, among others, issue was joined and a trial was had. Later the trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff on each material issue.
This defendant now contends that the record does not show it was guilty of infringing on plaintiff’s trademark or that it was guilty of doing any unlawful or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Del Monte Special Food Co. v. California Packing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- A & M RECORDS, INC. v. HeilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- American Distilling Co. v. Bellows & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of Calif.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Vita-Var Corp. v. Alumatone Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.