Legal Opinion

Probuilders Specialty Insurance v. Coaker

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 10, 2015No. Case No. C14-1888JLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT •

JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the court is Plaintiff Probuilders Specialty Insurance Company, RRG’s (“PBSIC”) motion for summary judgment seeking a declaration that PBSIC owes no duty to indemnify Defendants Michael and Marilee Coaker (“the Coakers”), Sundance Builders, Inc. (“Sundance”),' and Mike’s Roofing, Inc. (“Mike’s Roofing”) for damages arising out of the construction of the Coakers’ single-family home in Duvall, Washington. (See Mot. (Dkt. # 16) at 1-2; see also Reply (Dkt. # 21) at 1.) The Coak-ers and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faithlife Corporation v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  2. LESMIR CORPORATION and STANLEY ROSEN v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  3. Weyerhaeuser Company v. AIG Property Casualty IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API