Legal Opinion

LESMIR CORPORATION and STANLEY ROSEN v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 7, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00462Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 NO. 2:25-cv-462-RSL 8 LESMIR CORPORATION and STANLEY ROSEN, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION FOR SUMMARY Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT AND DENYING 10 PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, 12 Defendant. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This insurance coverage dispute arises from Houston Casualty Company’s denial 16 of coverage under an insurance policy issued to Lesmir Corporation. Dkt. 1. Before the 17 Court are “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” and “Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API