Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ohio Edison Co. v. Carroll

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1984No. 1227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.

Defendants, George and Ruth Carroll, appeal a trial court order granting the Ohio Edison Company an easement on defendants’ property and awarding them $2,226 in compensation for said easement. We affirm.

The plaintiff-appellee, Ohio Edison Company, is a public utility and an electric company providing electric current to its customers in Medina County and elsewhere in the state of Ohio. The Car-rolls own property at 2204 Marks Road, Valley City, Medina County, Ohio. On June 21, 1982, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas seeking to appropriate an easement…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hofius v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Board of Education of the City School District v. Holding Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Ohio Power Co. v. DillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of St. Marys v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Pepper Pike v. HirschauerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Duncan v. Am. Transm. Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API