Legal Opinion

Pepper Pike v. Hirschauer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1990No. Case No. 56963Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANN McMANAMON, J.,

Certain residents of Woodleigh Drive ("the owners") in Pepper Pike ("the City") challenge an appropriation order by the probate court taking approximately 75 feet from the rear of each of their properties. It is the owners' position that the City abused its discretion in acceding to the private interests of vocal residents on Creekside Drive, also in the City. The owners argue that the decision of the probate court is against the manifest weight of the evidence. We find upon review, that the owners' sole assignment of error is not well taken and affirm.

Consolidated with…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API