Legal Opinion

People v. Markham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1989No. S009472. Crim. 25539PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EAGLESON, J.

In People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 605 [147 Cal.Rptr. 172, 580 P.2d 672], this court first adopted “as a judicially declared rule of criminal procedure” the requirement that at trial the People prove the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession beyond a reasonable doubt. The United States Supreme Court had earlier held that the federal Constitution required only that the prosecution prove a confession voluntary by a preponderance of the evidence. (Lego v. Twomey (1972) 404 U.S. 477, 489 [30 L.Ed.2d 618, 627, 92 S.Ct. 619].)1

We granted review in this case to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API