People v. Markham
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
In People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 605 [147 Cal.Rptr. 172, 580 P.2d 672], this court first adopted “as a judicially declared rule of criminal procedure” the requirement that at trial the People prove the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession beyond a reasonable doubt. The United States Supreme Court had earlier held that the federal Constitution required only that the prosecution prove a confession voluntary by a preponderance of the evidence. (Lego v. Twomey (1972) 404 U.S. 477, 489 [30 L.Ed.2d 618, 627, 92 S.Ct. 619].)1
We granted review in this case to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.