Corrigan v. Methodist Hospital
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendant Donald Myers has filed five separate motions in limine with this Court. He addresses all of them in a single memorandum of law, as we resolve of them today. Myers seeks to exclude the following evidence:
1) any evidence regarding the regulatory status by the Food and Drug Administration of pedicle screws;
2) any expert testimony regarding lack of informed consent;
3) any evidence regarding an alleged financial tie between Myers and Acromed Corporation;
4) any expert testimony by plaintiff regarding the materiality of a risk and/or the ultimate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oscar Hines v. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. General Electric Company, Monsanto Company, and Penn Central CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Festa v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sagala v. TavaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jozsa v. HottensteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- United States v. ScarfoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Shea v. EsenstenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001