Van Arsdale Osborne v. Young
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kay County; before Bagará T. Rainer, Judge. Action by Van Arsdale & Osborne against A. Young to recover on a promissory note given on the 28th day of April, 1902, in the sum of $22.50, and $10 attorney’s fees. Judgment before a justice of the peace was rendered for the defendant, as it was also in the district court, and plaintiffs bring the case here by proceedings in error.
1Opinion of the Court
DüNN, J.
The note in question was given in payment of a premium for a cpntract of hail insurance in the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, which plaintiffs represented. The evidence shows that defendant signed the application for insurance and the note in payment therefor on the same day, and delivered them to the local agent, Yoeman, at Billings, Kay county, Okla. Yoeman sent them to the plaintiffs at Wichita, Kan., and plaintiff Van Arsdale, testifying in reference to the disposition that was made of the application on its arrival at Wichita, says:
“We received it from J. W. Yoeman,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heiman v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. MayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Allen v. Massachusetts Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Insurance Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
- Pickett v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dorman v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. McClureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Metropolitan, Etc., Ins. Co. v. BradyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Booker Tobacco Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.