Legal Opinion

Pickett v. German Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from McPherson District Court. Action to recover upon an application for insurance. To the plaintiff’s petition the defendant Insurance Company filed a general demurrer, which the court sustained at the August term, 1886. Plaintiff Pickett brings this ruling here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Clogston, C.:

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant upon an application of insurance made *698by him with the agent of the defendant. The application was written upon one of the company’s regular blanks, and so much thereof as is material to this inquiry is as follows:

“Application of Albert Pickett, of Canton, county of McPherson, state of Kansas, for insurance against loss or damage by fire, by the German Fire Insurance Company, of Peoria, Illinois, in the sum of $740, for the term of one year from the 27th day of July, 1885.”

Here follows the description of the property.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Central Ins. v. McLanathanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Winnesheik Insurance v. HolzgrafeIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Walker v. Farmers' Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Atkinson v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. McClureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Van Arsdale Osborne v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Harvey v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Butterfield v. Springfield Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Lamb v. Mechanics InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API