Legal Opinion

McCracken v. Government Employees Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 1985No. 22206PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Chief Justice:

This case is pending for determination in the United States District Court. Pursuant to Rule 46 of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, we agreed to rule upon a question certified by that Court to us as follows:

Under South Carolina law, can an innocent spouse recover his or her share under an insurance policy issued jointly to husband and wife, which insured property owned by them as joint tenants, where the loss by fire resulted from the intentional burning of the property by the other spouse?

Plaintiffs-appellants, Charles and Carol McCracken, sued Government…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Hosey v. Seibels Bruce Group, S.C. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Ryan v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. MARINE CONTRACTING AND TOWING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. CrookUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Republic Insurance Co. v. JerniganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Rena, Inc. v. BrienNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API