Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Molloy

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 8, 1981No. [No. 116, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

Petitioner St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company raises divers issues emanating from the trial which culminated in a final judgment, entered in favor of respondents Charles and Diane Molloy, awarding benefits found to be due them under a homeowner’s insurance policy for damage suffered and expenses incurred as a result of a fire in the Molloy abode on January 22, 1978. 1 Although we agree with the trial court’s ruling that, even if the allegation of Mr. Molloy’s pyromania is proven to be true, the co-insured spouse may be indemnified for her share of the loss, we determine the circuit…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Litz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Creveling v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API