Legal Opinion

Schneider v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1987No. L.A. 32270PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the State Bar that petitioner, James Ellis Schneider, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, that execution of the suspension be stayed, and that he be placed upon probation for three years. The recommended conditions of probation include two years’ actual suspension. The hearing panel’s recommendation was similar, but included no actual suspension.

I

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in the State of California on January 4, 1967, and has no prior discipline. The present allegations…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Leoni v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brookman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Calvert v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Levin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Aronin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API