Northern Trust Co. v. Healy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, entered in pursuance of an order by Belden, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment. No case or bill of exceptions is returned, and a reversal is urged on the ground that the conclusions of law and judgment are not sustained by the findings of fact.
The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the court finds: That on April 26, 1894, defendant became indebted to Johnson, Hurd & Co., a corporation, for labor and material furnished by it to him, and that the sum due therefor at the time of the trial *231was $712. That on April 23,1894, Johnson, Hurd & Co. made and delivered its promissory note to the partnership firm of Forman, Ford & Co.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stone v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Diven v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Northern Trust Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cosgrove v. McKasySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Veigel v. ConverseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Northern Trust Co. v. HiltgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Parker v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Columbian Building & Loan Co. v. Burke, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1932