Parker v. Schultz
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Albert. J.
The fact situation shows that the note sued on was for $800, dated November 10, 1930, and due in six months, drawing 8 per cent semiannual interest, together with interest on interest after due. The bank closed its doors and the receiver was appointed on the 11th day of December, 1930.
The defendant admits the execution of the note and that there is due on the same $940.17, together with interest, but pleads as an offset against the same the following facts: That one Elon Kirchoff was a creditor of said bank at the time of the appointment of the receiver to the extent of $6,525.96,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stone v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Oates v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Robinson v. AirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
- Avery v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Dyer v. SebrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Briley v. Board of Supervisors of Story CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939