Cosgrove v. McKasy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Petition in the district court for Le Sueur county in the matter of the assignment of Edson R. Smith and Rollin E. Smith, partners as E. R; Smith & Co., insolvents./ John McKasy, assignee of the insolvents, interposed an answer From an order, Cadwell, J., in part granting and in part denying the relief demanded, both the petitioners and the assignee appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollin'S, J.
Edson E. and Eollin E. Smith had for some time prior to July 8, 1893, been co-partners in business in Le Sueur county,, in this state, under the firm name of E. E. Smith & Co., keeping and conducting a bank of deposit generally known as the “Bank of Le Sueur.” They had previously executed and delivered a bond to the county, which bond had been duly approved, and said firm had been duly designated as a depositary of county funds, as provided by G. S. 1894, § 729 et seq. The Smiths were the principal obligors on this bond, which was a joint and several obligation; and these petitioners, J. E.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Paul & M. Trust Co. v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Northern Trust Co. v. HealySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Northern Trust Co. v. HiltgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richardson v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. Bank of MagdalenaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
- Veigel v. ConverseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Willis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Markell v. RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.