Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Swindall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1996No. S96Y0670PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding presents the question of whether disbarment is appropriate, under the circumstances of this case, following termination of an attorney’s appeal rights from felony convic tions for perjury. Because disbarment is generally appropriate where an attorney has been convicted of a felony involving fraud, absent mitigating circumstances not present here, we order that Patrick L. Swindall be disbarred from the practice of law.

Following his convictions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on nine counts of perjury in relation to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Charles Lanford, Jr.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Matter of LenoirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. In re ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. In the Matter of RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. In re CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re SkandalakisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. In Re BlitchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Amended January 23, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API