Legal Opinion

Young v. State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1853PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Owen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Assumpsit by the State Bank for the use of the branch at Terre Haute, against John Young and others, upon a promissory note payable at said branch. Judgment below for the plaintiff, September, 1841.

In 1845 the legislature of the state passed an act granting a new trial. The Circuit Court held said act unconstitutional, and refused to hear the new trial. Before considering this point, another will be noticed.

The judgment in the case upon the trial had, was entered as one by nil dicit, no defence appearing to have been interposed. Subsequently the record was amended, on the motion of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tipton v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1841

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pressley v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Johnson v. GebhauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lawson v. JeffriesMississippi Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API