Legal Opinion
Langever v. Miller
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1934No. Application No. 20,699PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton
This case is before us on application for writ of error. We have concluded that the application should be refused, and will state our reasons therefor.
The only question involved is the constitutionality of the Anti-Deficiency Judgment Law, approved April 21, 1933, now Chapter 92, General Laws, Regular Session of the 43d Legislature.
H. H. Miller, the defendant in error, obtained a judgment against the plaintiff in error on October 4, 1932, (long before the enactment of the statute here involved), for $1,338.29, with interest and $82.65 cost, and foreclosure of a second mortgage lien on real…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Mehrdad Moayedi v. Interstate 35/chisam Road, L.P. and Malachi Development CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.