Legal Opinion
Tipton v. Cummins
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1841PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE amending of a declaration in debt by inserting the amount of damages claimed, does not entitle the defendant to a continuance.
The plaintiff cannot take a judgment by nil dicit, if the general issue be on file. Harris v. The M. M. Co., 4 Blackf. 267.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harris v. Muskingum Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by3 opinions
- Webb v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Young v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Epperly v. LittleIndiana Supreme Court · 1855