Legal Opinion

Tipton v. Cummins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE amending of a declaration in debt by inserting the amount of damages claimed, does not entitle the defendant to a continuance.

The plaintiff cannot take a judgment by nil dicit, if the general issue be on file. Harris v. The M. M. Co., 4 Blackf. 267.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Muskingum Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Webb v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Young v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Epperly v. LittleIndiana Supreme Court · 1855