Legal Opinion
Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 22, 1938No. 6238PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
Upon November 20, 1925, the appellee issued an insurance policy to Weller, Geyser and Kronengold, doing business as “Tricho”, insuring them for the period from November 20, 1925, to November 20, 1926. Upon November 20, 1926, another policy was issued by the appellee insuring them for the period from November 20, 1926, to November 20, 1927. Both policies were identical in terms and these terms will be dealt with in some detail in this opinion.
In November, 1924, Weller, Geyser and Kronengold made a contract with the appellant to remove superfluous hair from her neck, arms…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Surety Corporation v. Western Fire & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Osborne v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
- Callaway v. Central Surety & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Repass v. Keleket X-Ray Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
- Producers Releasing Corp. De Cuba v. Pathe Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.