Legal Opinion
Repass v. Keleket X-Ray Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 31, 1962No. Civ. A. C-620-61PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, District Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on motion of defendants for judgment pursuant to Rule 56 on the ground that the action brought by plaintiff is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff seeks to recover damage for personal injuries sustained as a result of alleged negligence and breach of warranty on the part of defendant, Kelly-Koett Co., and its successors in interest, Keleket X-Ray Corp. and Tracer Lab., Inc.
Since the relationship existing among the defendant corporations and the present corporate status of each is not material to the issue presently before…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Howard v. West Jersey, C., R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Tortorello v. ReinfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Weinstein v. BlanchardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Rosenau v. City of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, Anew Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, Anew Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.