Legal Opinion

In re Keith H.

New York City Family Court

Decided December 14, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Damian J. Amodeo, J.

FACTS

Respondent is before the court on a petition alleging that he *471is a person in need of supervision (hereinafter PINS) as provided in article 7 of the Family Court Act. The petitioner is the principal of a local junior high school, where the respondent is a student. In substance the petition alleges that respondent is incorrigible and beyond the control of his parent and other lawful authority in that respondent was involved in a physical confrontation in the school hallway with another student; that respondent was involved in a number of other…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. In re David T.New York Court of Appeals · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Keith H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re Jodel KK.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re Cassandra R.New York City Family Court · 1992
  4. In re Keith H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API