Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 23, 2002No. 01-11998PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant/Plaintiff Andrew Wagner filed suit against Appellee/Defendants Daewoo Heavy Industries, Jack Mosler, George Valencia, David O’Dell, Donald Adams, and *1270Kevin Ho,1 alleging that Defendants “entered into a conspiracy to intimidate, harass, punish, and deter” him from testifying before a federal grand jury, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985. The district court granted Defendants’ 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We vacate the district court’s dismissal and instruct the district court to allow Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint.
BACKGROUND
According to Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Bickley Ex Rel. Georgia Pacific Corp. Life Health & Accident Plan v. Caremark Rx, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
- WESI, LLC v. Compass Environmental, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.