Legal Opinion

Logan v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1969No. State 125PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Where a writ of error is taken from an order denying a new trial, the question to be resolved by this court is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion. State v. Waters (1965), 28 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 153, 135 N. W. 2d 768; State v. Bidwell (1930), 201 Wis. 210, 212, 229 N. W. 633.

The defendant on this writ of error and on the motion before the trial court argued that the court abused its discretion inasmuch as the court committed a legal error when it sustained an objection to Larry Logan’s testimony as alibi, when it was in fact merely testimony that was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Pillsbury v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. WatersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Jensen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Klinkiewicz v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wold v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CuylerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API