Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1996No. 94-2256-CRPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals which reversed a judgment of conviction and remanded the matter for a new trial. Anthony Hicks (Hicks) was convicted of one count of burglary, one count of robbery, and two counts of second degree sexual assault. The court of appeals concluded that Hicks received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because defense counsel failed to have pubic hair specimens found at the crime scene subjected to DNA analysis.

We affirm the court of appeals but on different grounds. We perceive the issue as whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. McConnohieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. CuylerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dugas v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. MayoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. AveryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API